<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.1.3" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Owning a Gun Under Federal Law</title>
	<link>http://www.federaldefensecases.com/blog/firearms/owning-a-gun-under-federal-law/</link>
	<description>Free Legal News &#038; Law Commentary</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 17:16:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.1.3</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: GunShowOnTheNet</title>
		<link>http://www.federaldefensecases.com/blog/firearms/owning-a-gun-under-federal-law/#comment-250</link>
		<author>GunShowOnTheNet</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federaldefensecases.com/blog/firearms/owning-a-gun-under-federal-law/#comment-250</guid>
					<description>How does "shall NOT be infringed" go to "shall be infringed at will"?

"If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government ... The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms..."

- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #28.
http://gunshowonthenet.com/FederalistPapers/FedNo28.html

"The opinion of the Federalist has always been considered as of great authority. It is a complete commentary on our Constitution; and is appealed to by all parties in the questions to which that instrument has given birth. Its intrinsic merit entitles it to this high rank; and the part two of its authors performed in framing the constitution, put it very much in their power to explain the views with which it was framed..."

- Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, Cohens v. Virginia (1821).
http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALaw/CohensvVirginia.html

"Also, the conditions and circumstances of the period require a finding that while the stated purpose of the right to arms was to secure a well-regulated militia, the right to self-defense was assumed by the Framers."

- Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court.[As quoted in Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846); State v. Dawson, 272 N.C. 535, 159 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1968).]
http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/NunnVsState.html

"The defence of one’s self, justly called the primary law of nature, is not, nor can it be abrogated by any regulation of municipal law. This principle of defence is not confined merely to the person; it extends to the liberty and the property of a man: it is not confined merely to his own person; it extends to the persons of all those, to whom he bears a peculiar relation -- of his wife, of his parent, of his child, of his master, of his servant: nay, it extends to the person of every one, who is in danger; perhaps, to the liberty of every one, whose liberty is unjustly and forcibly attacked. It becomes humanity as well as justice."

- James Wilson,'Of the Natural Rights of Individuals', 1790-1792 (Signed the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution, Congressman, Delegate to the Constitutional Convention and U.S. Supreme Court Justice).
http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALEGAL/OftheNaturalRights.html

"The right of self-defence never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals."

- President James Monroe, Nov. 16, 1818 message to the U.S. House and Senate.[Journal of the Senate of the United States of America, November 17th, 1818.]
http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/Senate11171818.html

"That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment to use arms in defense of so valuable a blessing [as liberty], on which all the good and evil of life depends; is clearly my opinion; yet Arms...should be the last resort."

- George Washington, 1789 letter to George Mason.[The True George Washington, 10th Ed. By Paul Leicester Ford.]
http://gunshowonthenet.com/SecondAmend/GeorgeWashingtonArms.html

ALL of those men were AT the debates/framing on the Bill of Rights and/or Constitution. They KNOW what they meant, and they MEANT what they said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does &#8220;shall NOT be infringed&#8221; go to &#8220;shall be infringed at will&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8220;If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government &#8230; The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>- Alexander Hamilton, Federalist #28.<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/FederalistPapers/FedNo28.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/FederalistPapers/FedNo28.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The opinion of the Federalist has always been considered as of great authority. It is a complete commentary on our Constitution; and is appealed to by all parties in the questions to which that instrument has given birth. Its intrinsic merit entitles it to this high rank; and the part two of its authors performed in framing the constitution, put it very much in their power to explain the views with which it was framed&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>- Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court, Cohens v. Virginia (1821).<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALaw/CohensvVirginia.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALaw/CohensvVirginia.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Also, the conditions and circumstances of the period require a finding that while the stated purpose of the right to arms was to secure a well-regulated militia, the right to self-defense was assumed by the Framers.&#8221;</p>
<p>- Chief Justice John Marshall, U.S. Supreme Court.[As quoted in Nunn v. State, 1 Ga. 243, 251 (1846); State v. Dawson, 272 N.C. 535, 159 S.E.2d 1, 9 (1968).]<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/NunnVsState.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/NunnVsState.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The defence of one’s self, justly called the primary law of nature, is not, nor can it be abrogated by any regulation of municipal law. This principle of defence is not confined merely to the person; it extends to the liberty and the property of a man: it is not confined merely to his own person; it extends to the persons of all those, to whom he bears a peculiar relation &#8212; of his wife, of his parent, of his child, of his master, of his servant: nay, it extends to the person of every one, who is in danger; perhaps, to the liberty of every one, whose liberty is unjustly and forcibly attacked. It becomes humanity as well as justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>- James Wilson,&#8217;Of the Natural Rights of Individuals&#8217;, 1790-1792 (Signed the Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution, Congressman, Delegate to the Constitutional Convention and U.S. Supreme Court Justice).<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALEGAL/OftheNaturalRights.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/2ALEGAL/OftheNaturalRights.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The right of self-defence never ceases. It is among the most sacred, and alike necessary to nations and to individuals.&#8221;</p>
<p>- President James Monroe, Nov. 16, 1818 message to the U.S. House and Senate.[Journal of the Senate of the United States of America, November 17th, 1818.]<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/Senate11171818.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/AfterTheFact/Senate11171818.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;That no man should scruple, or hesitate a moment to use arms in defense of so valuable a blessing [as liberty], on which all the good and evil of life depends; is clearly my opinion; yet Arms&#8230;should be the last resort.&#8221;</p>
<p>- George Washington, 1789 letter to George Mason.[The True George Washington, 10th Ed. By Paul Leicester Ford.]<br />
<a href="http://gunshowonthenet.com/SecondAmend/GeorgeWashingtonArms.html" rel="nofollow">http://gunshowonthenet.com/SecondAmend/GeorgeWashingtonArms.html</a></p>
<p>ALL of those men were AT the debates/framing on the Bill of Rights and/or Constitution. They KNOW what they meant, and they MEANT what they said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason trimble</title>
		<link>http://www.federaldefensecases.com/blog/firearms/owning-a-gun-under-federal-law/#comment-441</link>
		<author>jason trimble</author>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.federaldefensecases.com/blog/firearms/owning-a-gun-under-federal-law/#comment-441</guid>
					<description>I WAS WONDERING THAT IF I HAVE A FELONY IF I CAN OWN A HUNTING RIFLE IN MY NAME</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I WAS WONDERING THAT IF I HAVE A FELONY IF I CAN OWN A HUNTING RIFLE IN MY NAME</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
