Economic Crisis finds its way into the Federal Judicial System
Sunday, September 14th, 2008There is little doubt that the economy has been a hot topic recently in many households across America. This matter has also spewed over into the federal judicial system as one notable defendant, Robert Graham, is experiencing the brunt of frustration for the economic meltdown while federal prosecutors seek to have him sent to federal prison for over 230 years.
AIG Scandal results in Conviction of Graham
The name American International Group, Inc (AIG) has become synonymous with the economic crisis and the lengthy sentence Graham now faces is a result of a conviction federal prosecutors obtained for his role in an insurance scandal to defraud investors of AIG. According to trial testimony, Graham, who was the former senior council of the insurance firm General Reinsurance, assisted in the deal with AIG, which ultimately led to the indictment and conviction of five additional defendants.
At the root of the scandal, federal prosecutors allege that General Reinsurance paid AIG a $10 million insurance policy and that this money was later secretly returned. AIG then booked over $500 million in false loss reserves in an attempt to impress Wall Street analysts and to increase its stock price. Prosecutors allege that Graham offered advice which helped to “legitimize bogus documents and to conceal the fraud” thus abusing his position with General Reinsurance.
Did Graham’s Criminal Conduct contribute to the Seven Hundred Billion Dollar Bailout or is he just another Scapegoat? As a result of the financial crisis, United States taxpayers have had to bail out AIG with over $122 billion in loans while AIG company executives are now being questioned in congressional hearings. Federal prosecutors argue that the Graham and the other defendants deserve heavy sentences because their criminal conduct contributed to the financial ruin of AIG, thus requiring the bailout to avoid a complete collapse. Graham’s Attorney, Alan Vinegrad, argued to the jury that prosecutors are overstating the seriousness of his client’s misconduct. According to Vinegard, Graham didn’t initiate the scheme, did not have any control over the amount of loss, nor did he personally benefit from it. Jurors did not agree with Vinegard’s assessment, however, and convicted Graham on all counts.
Graham’s sentencing was initially held on September 25, 2008, but was rescheduled at the request of defense attorneys after the government’s recommendation of the 230 year sentence. The court has yet to reschedule sentencing in this matter.


